Logo-mj
Med J Tabriz Uni Med Sciences Health Services. 2012;33(6): 13-18.
  Abstract View: 791
  PDF Download: 103

Original Article

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Clostridium Difficile Isolated from Medical Staff of Imam Reza Hospital in Tabriz

Mohammad Taghi Akhi, Tahere Pirzade*, Mohammad Aghazade, Yusef Bafande, Mortaza Gojazade, Mohsen Mojdebar, Behrooz Pourasghari
*Corresponding Author: Email: t_pirzad@yahoo.com E- mail:

Abstract

Background and Objectives: In vitro determination of C. difficile susceptibility is not routinely performed in the laboratories. The aim of this study was to determine antibiotic sensitivity of C. difficile isolated from hospital staff and also to evaluate recovery rate of C. difficile from stools by three methods. Materials and Methods: One hundred stool samples of hospital staff were collected. Three standard anaerobic methods were used to isolate C. difficile: direct plating on CCFA, inoculation on blood agar following enrichment by alcohol shock and 0.1% sodium taurocholate. Suspicious colonies with specific horse odor were identified by biochemical tests. All isolates were tested by disk diffusion method using 14 antibiotic disks. MIC of isolates were determined for vancomycin and metronidazole by E.test Results: Eighteen C. difficile were isolated from staff of 13 different wards. The maximum and minimum number of C. difficile was isolated from internal, ICU wards (each 5 isolates) and orthopedic, physiotherapy wards (each 1 isolate), respectively. No resistant isolates to vancomycin and metronidazole were detected by disk diffusion or E-test. All isolates were found to be resistant to polymyxin B and ceftriaxone (100%). The rate of recovery by 0.1% sodium taurocholate enrichment method and alcohol shock was significantly higher than those by CCFA (P= 0.02 and P=0.04, respectively). Conclusion: Personnel of Imam Reza Hospital in Tabriz can be considered as source of C. difficile infection. All tested strains were found to be susceptible to metronidazole and vancomycin. The rate of recovery by enrichment methods is higher than those by CCFA culture.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 792

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 103

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 11 Mar 2012
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)