Logo-mj
Submitted: 29 Nov 2023
Revision: 23 Feb 2024
Accepted: 26 Feb 2024
ePublished: 27 May 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

Med J Tabriz Uni Med Sciences. Inpress.
doi: 10.34172/mj.025.33517
  Abstract View: 10

Plastic Surgery

Short Communication

Comparison of the Two Methods of Acute Burn Depth Assessment by Clinical Judgment and Laser Doppler Imaging in Motahari Hospital, Tehran. Iran

Mostafa Dahmardehei 1* ORCID logo, Hamid Mohamadhoseini 1 ORCID logo, Tayyeb Ghadimi 1 ORCID logo, Mahdy Saboury 1 ORCID logo

1 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine and Burn Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Email: lasertrials@gmail.com

Abstract

Background. For surgeons, accurately determining the depth and extent of burns is difficult. Consequently, the management and course of burn treatment are significantly impacted by an accurate diagnosis of burn depth. The purpose of the current study was to assess the accuracy of acute burn depth assessment using laser Doppler and clinical evaluations.

Methods. The current research is a clinical trial. Overall, 120 burn patients were evaluated in this study. The data collection tool was a researcher-made form. SPSS, Chi-square tests, and one-way analysis of variance were used to analyze the data.

Results. The results revealed that the average age of the subjects was 35.29 years, and most of them were male. The most common cause of burns was flame, and most of the patients who participated in the study had the depth of “2nd-degree partial thickness and 2nd-degree deep thickness burns”. The accuracy rate was 80.83% and 96.66% in the clinical evaluation and laser Doppler, respectively.

Conclusion. More accurate and effective than the clinical evaluation method, the laser Doppler method detects burn levels. For clinical evaluation in burn treatment facilities, it is, therefore, advised that the laser Doppler method be taken into consideration as an alternative.

Practical Implications. The accuracy of laser Doppler in detecting the depth and extent of burns is higher than clinical evaluations. It is better to use it at least for second- and third-degree burns for a better diagnosis.


How to cite this article: Dahmadehei M, Mohamadhoseini H, Ghadimi T, Saboury M. Comparison of the Two Methods of Acute Burn Depth Assessment by Clinical Judgment and Laser Doppler Imaging in Motahari Hospital, Tehran. Iran. Med J Tabriz Uni Med Sciences. 2025;47(2): doi: 10.34172/mj.025.33517. Persian.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 11

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 0

Your browser does not support the canvas element.