Logo-mj
Med J Tabriz Uni Med Sciences. 2024;46(4): 430-442.
doi: 10.34172/mj.2024.045
  Abstract View: 191
  PDF Download: 67

Urology

Original Article

Comparative evaluation of the current preparation process of patients undergoing surgery in comparison with the clinical guidelines: A case study of the urology ward of Imam Reza education and research hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Zahra Golmarzi 1 ORCID logo, Mohsen Amjadi 1 ORCID logo, Fateme Tahmasbi 2 ORCID logo, Farzin Soleimanzadeh 1* ORCID logo

1 Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Health Management and Safety Promotion Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Email: farzinsoleimanzade@gmail.com

Abstract

Background. The pre-operative evaluations of patients should not cause any mental or physical harm to the patient or waste the financial resources of the patient or the public health system by unnecessary actions. Health spending is one of the issues of concern in developed and developing countries. In Iran, 5–10% of government spending is allocated to this sector. The purpose of the present study was to compare the current process of preparing surgical candidates with accepted clinical guidelines.

Methods. In this cross-sectional study, sampling was performed by the judgmental/purposive method among the mentioned population; finally, 134 patients were evaluated in this study. The data were categorized as 3 x 4 tables. On one side of the table, patients were divided into small, intermediate, and large surgical groups according to surgical complexity, and on the opposite side of the table, they were assigned to four groups at low, intermediate, high, and very high risk. As a result, each patient was housed in one of the houses on a 12-hole table. The clinical findings and evaluation results before surgery were extracted and evaluated retrospectively.

Results. The mean age of the patients was 49.68 ± 16.96 years, and 74.6% were male. The most common type of surgery was transurethral lithotripsy. The incidence of hypertension (21.4%) among underlying diseases and comorbidities was the highest recorded item. The procedures were selected relatively in the same population size from three groups, namely, small, intermediate, and large procedures, with a frequency of 50 (37.3%), 34 (25.4%), and 50 (37.3%) cases, respectively.

Conclusion. In the present study, the majority of patients with minor surgeries did not comply with the valuations recommended by guidelines. Among the patients with intermediate surgeries, in nearly half of the cases, and in the major or complex surgery group, most of the time, the evaluations were performed in accordance with the guidelines.

Practical Implications. Physicians should consider adhering to current clinical guidelines when requesting preclinical tests, which can pave the way for minimizing unnecessary costs.


How to cite this article: Golmarzi Z, Amjadi M, Tahmasbi F, Soleimanzadeh F. Comparative evaluation of the current preparation process of patients undergoing surgery in comparison with the clinical guidelines: A case study of the urology ward of Imam Reza education and research hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Med J Tabriz Uni Med Sciences. 2024;46(4):430-442. doi: 10.34172/mj.2024.045. Persian.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 192

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 67

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 16 Jul 2023
Accepted: 25 Oct 2023
ePublished: 07 Jul 2024
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)